Monday, October 22, 2007

OPS AND NONSENSE

Some cop complainants seek to 'enhance their case in court,' superintendent says

It should have also been noted that (anecdotally)90% of the remaining complainants are for nonsense. I have seen CR complaints that should have never seen the light of day. An officers is responding to an assignment when he encounters a traffic accident, it is determined that there are no injuries and that the involved vehicles are drivable. The officer instructs the involved parties relocate to the station to prepare a traffic crash report. A complaint is filed against the officer for failure to take police action. Another example has two officers respond to a fight between two 8 year olds and the parent of the looser in the altercation files a complaint because the officers failed to take police action and arrest the offender. There are countless examples out there of such nonsense. Please post your examples of complaints that should have never been generated in the first place.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

lt. results arriving today

Anonymous said...

A detective calls a person back while in the field from their own personal cell phone and tells the person to make the call quick, and the person files a complaint about it.

Anonymous said...

LT. Test results received TODAY - Tuesday 23 OCTOBER

I placed 534.

Will I get promoted if enough sergeants get indicted?

Anonymous said...

Any word on the next sgt's class?

Anonymous said...

Desk sgt is told by a complainant, via Illinois Bell, who just received a ticket that the officer was "disrespectful" to her and called her names. This rectal ranger (the desk sgt) gets a cr number (against g.o.'s) on the p.o.. When investigated, the complainant hung up on me 3 times and on the 4th attempt to get a her side of the story she told me to go have sex with myself. Not being a hermaphrodite I refused any suggestions of self impregnation. I attempted to unfound the case and was directed by the deputy chief of patrol for the area to "not sustain" it because I could not prove it "DID'NT" happen. You know the rest.

Anonymous said...

...Desk sgt is told by a complainant, via Illinois Bell, who just received a ticket that the officer was "disrespectful" to her and called her names. This rectal ranger (the desk sgt) gets a cr number (against g.o.'s) on the p.o.. When investigated, the complainant hung up on me 3 times and on the 4th attempt to get a her side of the story she told me to go have sex with myself. Not being a hermaphrodite I refused any suggestions of self impregnation. I attempted to unfound the case and was directed by the deputy chief of patrol for the area to "not sustain" it because I could not prove it "DID'NT" happen. You know the rest...

Bullshit---you cannot interview the complainant until you get the affidavit signed. No affidavit then it's unfounded.

Anonymous said...

A suspect once filed charges agaisnt me for "Armed Robbery" when I arrested him for assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, a large wrench. I also confiscated a large double edged knife from the suspect and refused to return it because it was illegal to posses.

As a result, the perp filed a complaint against me for Armed Robbery because I was wearing a firearm when I took his knife away. This complaint actually made it to a show cause hearing in front of a judge who actually had to leave the court room to "Think" about the decision, the complaint was dismissed.

Anonymous said...

Desk sgt is told by a complainant, via Illinois Bell, who just received a ticket that the officer was "disrespectful" to her and called her names. This rectal ranger (the desk sgt) gets a cr number (against g.o.'s) on the p.o.. .....

HOW IS THAT AGAINST GENERAL ORDER??? (If the complainant provided their name which I assume they did since you called them back) I'll bet you're one of those sgts beefing that the Lts test was unfair

rosco said...

People nowadays have become soft, very soft. Nothing is your fault. The whole public aid program? Change must come. I see public aid receivers looking like they eat too well. They get "Pampers" instead of cloth diapers. Why top shelf name brand stuff? Give them 10 lbs. bags of rice, potatoes, and 70% lean ground beef. No cash for smokes and 40's.

Anonymous said...

If the lieutenant's association has a dinner on the odyssey.....and it sinks, then I should make it!

Anonymous said...

Bullshit---you cannot interview the complainant until you get the affidavit signed. No affidavit then it's unfounded.

Wed Oct 24, 09:35:00 AM

You Sir have the sweet smell of a north side supervisor. And no intricate thinking abilities; Purely reactive, for that personal slam dunk feeling.

MAYBE THE INCIDENT HAPPENED BEFORE THE AFFIDAVIT PROCEEDURE!!!

God bless the poor officers up north who have to work for you.

Anonymous said...

Oct24, 9:35...

You must be new...We didn't have affidavits before 2005...

And we could not unfound based on the fact that you couldn't contact the complainant or the complainant told you to havesex with your mother....

Stop disrespecting people because you are ignorant. You'll never learn if you don't listen...

Please keep in mind that this is an open blog
that can and is read by people other than Chicago Police Officers.